{"id":"W2034453275","doi":"10.1080/10282580.2010.498238","title":"Responding to young people responsible for harm: a comparative study of restorative and conventional approaches","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Justice Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention","keywords":"Restorative justice; Accountability; Recidivism; Sophistication; Harm; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Compliance (psychology); Closure (psychology); Qualitative research; Criminology; Social psychology; Political science; Sociology; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009629617,0.0004098561,0.0009888413,0.002506826,0.004892932,0.002206064,0.0008504612,0.001259397,0.004057505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01489711,0.0006597712,0.0007349353,0.001598896,0.00265808,0.002287163,0.002489237,0.002141013,0.0003571431],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002622286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003450181,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008081742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02046101,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9932272,0.004142712,0.0003939585,0.0003170579,0.0007595886,0.00115964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928722,0.003887523,0.001211874,0.0002842905,0.0009125702,0.0008315495],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001403387,0.008649537,0.08297283,0.0007730337,0.00009149328,0.001204353,0.8717631,0.00004966482,0.001151415,0.001253598,0.0005758183,0.03011182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002573112,0.008951898,0.08909427,0.0002926432,0.00007294908,0.000491577,0.8961663,0.00006842548,0.0004230072,0.0002481275,0.003890731,0.00004263332],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989337,0.0001341392,0.0000473444,0.00005543193,0.00001082379,0.0001187405,0.00002084997,0.000001108871,0.0006777706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983968,0.0003731526,0.0001989613,0.0001230345,0.00001598954,0.0003208616,0.00003205198,0.000002458137,0.0005366486],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009629617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05092692,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2207510629125185,"score_gpt":0.4238081571422456,"score_spread":0.2030570942297271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}