{"id":"W2034460486","doi":"10.1080/14927713.2005.9651336","title":"Examining policy preferences of recreationists: A case of a fisheries management plan","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leisure/Loisir","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Recreational fishing; Preference; Recreation; Choice modelling; Fishing; Fisheries management; Plan (archaeology); Revealed preference; Latent class model; Business; Discrete choice; Fishery; Economics; Marketing; Geography; Computer science; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003055969,0.00009929543,0.0002774314,0.000154763,0.00005064565,0.00001793401,0.0001074933,0.00005676885,0.0004451198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000225525,0.0001158997,0.00004850491,0.000103691,0.00007438232,0.0002119075,0.00004603394,0.00004563928,0.0000820034],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000119884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001017112,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009160221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002019431,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999041,0.00001260831,0.0005631343,0.0002212357,0.00002609365,0.0001359117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993155,0.00003069406,0.0003901816,0.0002200737,0.000008047974,0.00003548893],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002903355,0.0001856676,0.7826055,0.0001547714,0.0001577741,0.000007589523,0.00219025,0.0009097898,0.0000668626,0.1903675,0.0005052698,0.02282006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001715872,0.0003773888,0.9267286,0.0001040212,0.00004320253,0.00007597264,0.002744361,0.002004135,0.002598218,0.02458662,0.03848392,0.0005376674],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9350728,0.0002827217,0.0002964909,0.0002581541,0.0000462012,0.0001648683,0.00008165325,0.00001231825,0.06378482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953235,0.000266857,0.00302859,0.00003817439,0.00006981718,0.0000260485,0.00002504469,0.00001144415,0.001210456],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1657808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.487375,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1351829551913739,"score_gpt":0.240216399207039,"score_spread":0.1050334440156651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}