{"id":"W2034550171","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.04.041","title":"Green logistics at Eroski: A case study","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Production Economics","topic":"Sustainable Supply Chain Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":334,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Green logistics; Business; Vehicle routing problem; Operations research; Competitive advantage; Computer science; Process management; Reverse logistics; Operations management; Environmental economics; Risk analysis (engineering); Supply chain; Marketing; Routing (electronic design automation); Economics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007138947,0.0006172468,0.0003429204,0.001160693,0.008004683,0.002312578,0.001496233,0.004019574,0.01070908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00117756,0.000335403,0.0006659508,0.001531007,0.001421249,0.001847545,0.001686108,0.001457086,0.002079286],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002953914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002180857,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02437947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06995495,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994749,0.0001363588,0.00001585697,0.00005927817,0.00008757663,0.0002259983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991295,0.0002424343,0.00007811286,0.0000635639,0.00007993331,0.0004065086],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"case_report","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003003981,0.01027499,0.09811035,0.0009365756,0.0002696232,0.5763716,0.07662327,0.04023336,0.0181592,0.03751424,0.02467185,0.113831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005211242,0.004101628,0.1055698,0.0006047329,0.0003180711,0.08712614,0.4638008,0.03353931,0.02198564,0.01534139,0.2665474,0.000544079],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9753767,0.00008987234,0.001436461,0.000991138,0.00003458971,0.00007966213,0.000202963,0.00006427887,0.02172439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9716109,0.0003460536,0.002117598,0.0001726004,0.00002002124,0.00002974911,0.0001280179,0.00006398236,0.02551101],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02437947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04847509,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01925372577843579,"score_gpt":0.2501723327929125,"score_spread":0.2309186070144767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}