{"id":"W2034627835","doi":"10.1016/s0191-8869(03)00219-8","title":"Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the cognitive styles analysis","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Personality and Individual Differences","topic":"Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences","field":"Psychology","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Reliability (semiconductor); Cognitive style; Cognition; Test (biology); Validity; Empirical research; Style (visual arts); Cognitive psychology; Applied psychology; Psychometrics; Developmental psychology; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002762254,0.0001274631,0.0002848938,0.00004185065,0.000226357,0.00002665022,0.0001699672,0.00008538202,0.0006465688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001316539,0.00006620579,0.0001529981,0.0003760897,0.0009882879,0.00004833519,0.00007232167,0.0001715645,5.62858e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007973533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006884878,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005759618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002837171,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955605,0.003016093,0.000247306,0.0002955399,0.0007413068,0.00013928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983473,0.0007819194,0.000274877,0.0001782482,0.00038382,0.00003379967],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001741518,0.0001293714,0.9806597,0.00002057469,0.0005265011,2.210534e-8,0.008866535,8.407603e-7,0.00001175339,0.004527595,0.000006559112,0.005233151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003887075,0.0000758852,0.9764296,0.00003511801,0.00255905,8.752187e-7,0.01337542,0.00005419927,0.0002431077,0.006745102,0.000009670903,0.00008319133],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929184,0.0005478373,0.00001856633,0.0001498715,0.00008808513,0.0002402355,0.0002451278,0.000004247994,0.005787646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997835,0.00002343479,0.00000703688,0.00005199809,0.00001211524,0.00002134802,0.000005183289,0.000002653282,0.0000927139],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006865134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7079475,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1280027676602265,"score_gpt":0.3506368078057596,"score_spread":0.2226340401455331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}