{"id":"W2034634998","doi":"10.4296/cwrj3702916","title":"A Resiliency Assessment of Ontario's Low-water Response Mechanism: Implications for Addressing Management of Low-water Under Potential Future Climate Change","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques","topic":"Flood Risk Assessment and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Impact; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Mechanism (biology); Vulnerability (computing); Resilience (materials science); Environmental resource management; Climate change; Preparedness; Water scarcity; Water resources; Environmental science; Adaptation (eye); Ambiguity; Environmental planning; Business; Water resource management; Computer science; Ecology; Psychology; Computer security; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002133142,0.0001984317,0.0001786119,0.0007559602,0.002985154,0.001899254,0.00112974,0.0004371702,0.00266713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003935523,0.0001348479,0.0002643949,0.0008659657,0.001034793,0.0009603396,0.0009944002,0.0003234038,0.0001548553],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0249885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04389983,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8898098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9664235,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991288,0.00014856,0.00003127701,0.00006142727,0.0003031568,0.0003268443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972222,0.0002974657,0.0003982726,0.0001017496,0.001284294,0.0006961814],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002715588,0.0001637364,0.797704,0.0005977698,0.000111114,0.001555921,0.01925387,0.01257278,0.01171588,0.01336183,0.01473473,0.1279566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002097892,0.000229519,0.8968229,0.0001759817,0.00005963841,0.0001199393,0.04868107,0.01042211,0.001681255,0.002752103,0.03896462,0.00006987187],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9551053,0.0003262224,0.002998664,0.006237299,0.00002968945,0.0004099952,0.000652083,0.0001129388,0.03412775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923342,0.0002426029,0.003503857,0.0001343234,0.000004265971,0.00005784089,0.0001416234,0.000008236287,0.003573031],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1101902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2216783,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02029346153001604,"score_gpt":0.2468928328722816,"score_spread":0.2265993713422656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}