{"id":"W2034727817","doi":"10.4141/s04-041","title":"Using measurements of soil CO<sub>2</sub> efflux and concentrations to infer the depth distribution of CO<sub>2</sub> production in a forest soil","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Soil Science","topic":"Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Environmental science; Soil science; Carbon dioxide; Soil respiration; Soil water; Temperate forest; Soil horizon; Atmosphere (unit); Temperate climate; Hydrology (agriculture); Atmospheric sciences; Soil carbon; Diffusion; Chemistry; Geology; Ecology; Meteorology; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001104975,0.0001452284,0.0001938731,0.00004634039,0.0003338141,0.00004475008,0.0003350567,0.00005461713,0.00001109866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001936289,0.0001222134,0.0000478544,0.0006686201,0.001617987,0.0006564613,0.00004573891,0.0001761126,0.000005510761],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001317377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004928439,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004660743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1300295,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981368,0.00005795157,0.0004866642,0.0002442481,0.0006421336,0.0004322206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989506,0.00002182145,0.0003262807,0.0001891388,0.00005063705,0.000461547],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000820789,0.00002780702,0.4618989,0.000004263499,0.000004338342,0.000001810969,0.0005138807,0.351136,0.1804902,0.000009290107,0.00006055369,0.005844785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002812603,0.00009433555,0.7752035,0.00007419025,0.00002190793,0.00005732652,0.0003656415,0.00961258,0.2140384,0.00005492228,0.00005553889,0.0001404692],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972054,0.00005003321,0.001852113,0.0003830643,0.0001262679,0.0002006476,0.00001034712,0.000002227883,0.0001698401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993453,0.00003866735,0.0004504915,0.0001026687,0.00004439108,0.000003005001,0.000002149226,0.000008632644,0.000004689163],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3415234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8858452,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02004080504647339,"score_gpt":0.2304387452417402,"score_spread":0.2103979401952668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}