{"id":"W2034761313","doi":"10.1007/s10822-010-9339-3","title":"Predictions of hydration free energies from continuum solvent with solute polarizable models: the SAMPL2 blind challenge","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design","topic":"Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"TransCanada (Canada); Merck Canada Inc. (Canada)","funders":"Merck Canada","keywords":"Polarizability; Solvent; Polarizable continuum model; Thermodynamics; Statistical physics; Solvent effects; Computational chemistry; Chemical physics; Chemistry; Physics; Quantum mechanics; Molecule; Organic chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001996504,0.0008543147,0.001237206,0.0004077021,0.0005081996,0.00106973,0.001873144,0.001680394,0.001854374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006257638,0.0006626112,0.0005555257,0.0003914385,0.0006877194,0.002691333,0.00104767,0.001575553,0.0005031353],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000578812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001095651,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003816477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002642828,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997411,0.0001167274,0.000008688281,0.000042791,0.00006362478,0.00002694251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974437,0.001691494,0.0001383862,0.0002817066,0.0002126368,0.0002321741],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005408904,0.0002130365,0.001482927,0.0002645478,0.00007297084,0.0001612165,0.00008907044,0.9371932,0.009070912,0.02509156,0.005599809,0.02021982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003774343,0.00001650745,0.00009657582,0.000003282412,0.00000244443,0.000005401042,0.000008262621,0.9869359,0.001083913,0.0116382,0.0001649111,0.00000688775],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7056376,0.001912144,0.2733063,0.004833225,0.0002252388,0.00009256519,0.002083272,0.002137061,0.009772576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9542976,0.0004397352,0.04168856,0.0003286499,0.0000981062,0.00006836903,0.0007611276,0.000352413,0.00196548],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003816477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01055866,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01734962229519997,"score_gpt":0.2257807153637298,"score_spread":0.2084310930685298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}