{"id":"W2034782841","doi":"10.1007/s11948-011-9327-6","title":"Hype and Public Trust in Science","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":119,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Health Canada; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Enthusiasm; Philosophy of science; Public trust; Public relations; Science communication; Empirical evidence; Empirical research; Political science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Science education; Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Law; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004754521,0.00003963702,0.00004350569,0.0002472771,0.0006680953,0.0001553278,0.0002950186,0.00005498855,0.00002970189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001754059,0.00003933631,0.000004197614,0.00114004,0.002124891,0.0006467108,0.0001066719,0.0002260333,0.000003500222],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007111701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003171601,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009222373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00130592,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991554,0.00001941321,0.00006647781,0.0001468439,0.0003620686,0.0002498057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999508,0.00006750127,0.00001366553,0.0001232493,0.0001491363,0.0001384775],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002320848,0.00003752726,0.03820661,0.0000349679,7.259819e-7,0.000001202031,0.3823628,0.000005839375,0.01212976,0.5364542,0.0000111313,0.03075291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003886125,0.00007913704,0.8329449,0.0001511673,0.000005310344,0.000009423421,0.08164751,0.01440393,0.0005092125,0.00552032,0.06370569,0.0006348253],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9688164,0.0001132716,0.00005794162,0.002775647,0.0001759052,0.00006250061,6.22652e-7,0.00004878151,0.02794894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967835,0.002153619,0.0008571849,0.0001555792,0.00001672045,0.000003308988,1.862816e-7,0.000002114773,0.00002779554],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7947382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7829251,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6613253772258837,"score_gpt":0.4482507958135379,"score_spread":0.2130745814123458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}