{"id":"W2034956908","doi":"10.1136/injuryprev-2012-040580g.26","title":"ASSESSING INTER-RATER RELIABILITY OF ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT DATA IN A CASE-CONTROL STUDY ON BICYCLING INJURIES","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Injury Prevention","topic":"Traffic and Road Safety","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Audit; Reliability (semiconductor); Kappa; Poison control; Pedestrian; Injury prevention; Occupational safety and health; Human factors and ergonomics; Cohen's kappa; Transport engineering; Environmental health; Psychology; Medicine; Statistics; Engineering; Mathematics; Accounting; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008958997,0.0001253134,0.0001850844,0.00009257155,0.00003575043,0.00001808571,0.0001309091,0.00006656693,0.00006819272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002949538,0.0001160903,0.0000393612,0.00007196343,0.00002835647,0.0008233803,0.00007770849,0.0001838833,0.0000192345],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009016818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006456261,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001286801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001895281,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989535,0.0001582429,0.0003950956,0.000182966,0.0001203103,0.0001898755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993526,0.00006325037,0.00006179306,0.000481888,0.000003798492,0.0000366289],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001515051,0.002013968,0.8792752,0.000110142,0.0001084592,0.00002108483,0.002394881,0.002655636,0.005209574,0.00001012021,0.00009750758,0.1079519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005859947,0.0001538523,0.9940095,0.00007707292,0.00005331351,0.000008190889,0.001290839,0.00292374,0.0006075585,0.00002744932,0.0001132151,0.0001492671],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957005,0.00007249603,0.003182485,0.00001008009,0.000383511,0.0003525698,0.00009984192,0.00006775757,0.0001307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995539,0.000004732325,0.000280751,0.000004598754,0.00008412505,0.00001473813,0.00001938968,0.00001888905,0.00001886714],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1147343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4734023,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02282511908003385,"score_gpt":0.3024874548815003,"score_spread":0.2796623358014664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}