{"id":"W2034958306","doi":"10.1177/0193945902250039","title":"Assessing the Methodological Quality of Nonrandomized Intervention Studies","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Western Journal of Nursing Research","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Blinding; Comparability; Psychological intervention; MEDLINE; Quality (philosophy); Scope (computer science); Health care; Intervention (counseling); Evidence-based medicine; Scale (ratio); Medicine; Rigour; Research design; Clinical study design; Randomized controlled trial; Psychology; Applied psychology; Alternative medicine; Nursing; Clinical trial; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.7359924,0.003476073,0.0111823,0.02189679,0.002924794,0.008801249,0.006094866,0.0053767,0.003711789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.872006,0.003859605,0.01616417,0.01880615,0.007494972,0.00729139,0.00724883,0.003773744,0.0006950334],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01062173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01393029,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006723967,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1600974,0.4481308,0.3277081,0.0133744,0.04946719,0.001222046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.09598645,0.6960086,0.1026895,0.05849619,0.04564302,0.001176227],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006373887,0.0004673431,0.07074017,0.490253,0.1231828,0.0008863498,0.01278012,0.004558329,0.002054937,0.02604278,0.006703321,0.255957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01227253,0.005478052,0.08918164,0.3431652,0.2308625,0.002313747,0.006026656,0.02085185,0.01250362,0.1532181,0.1227099,0.001416283],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0406001,0.3280546,0.4748839,0.01241435,0.008274703,0.1187459,0.005504224,0.0007684406,0.01075387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3120553,0.04488821,0.4435574,0.00773342,0.001299781,0.185757,0.002752939,0.0004229127,0.001533027],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2640076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3255684,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9952679877189412,"score_gpt":0.8455051949806434,"score_spread":0.1497627927382978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}