{"id":"W2034967713","doi":"10.1023/b:jcam.0000047813.47656.36","title":"Reverse-docking as a computational tool for the study of asymmetric organocatalysis","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design","topic":"Computational Drug Discovery Methods","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"New Brunswick Innovation Foundation","keywords":"Docking (animal); Enantioselective synthesis; Chemistry; Organocatalysis; Enantiomer; Cationic polymerization; Stereochemistry; Catalysis; Combinatorial chemistry; Computational chemistry; Organic chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008687671,0.0009837286,0.002013554,0.0007951334,0.001024234,0.001115854,0.002305213,0.001119004,0.007125341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001579364,0.0005149394,0.0009076621,0.0009009822,0.0004691766,0.0006484576,0.0008717593,0.001740084,0.0006640709],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008968018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001790426,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007595241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006780593,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997187,0.0001204339,0.00001054488,0.00002618079,0.00008759857,0.00003656492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993446,0.0004415111,0.00004165045,0.00005072977,0.00008625781,0.00003511865],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004635487,0.0002327606,0.0009980068,0.0003370312,0.0001579139,0.0003899905,0.00008448115,0.9188509,0.005450764,0.0384174,0.003755368,0.0308619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001022879,0.00005390091,0.00005539483,0.000006620223,0.00002351496,0.0000255986,0.00001239626,0.994618,0.001518573,0.002665555,0.0009067575,0.00001134572],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.4807568,0.001527498,0.4676743,0.001081143,0.0003085365,0.0003452125,0.002383808,0.009163792,0.03675883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7758614,0.000925584,0.2170576,0.0002432999,0.00005082519,0.0005459837,0.001241309,0.0008583703,0.003215498],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007595241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02383667,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02799403336623817,"score_gpt":0.3050360797353006,"score_spread":0.2770420463690624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}