{"id":"W2034981803","doi":"10.1109/tcad.2012.2192478","title":"FPGA Power Reduction by Guarded Evaluation Considering Logic Architecture","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems","topic":"Low-power high-performance VLSI design","field":"Engineering","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Lookup table; Field-programmable gate array; Computer science; Application-specific integrated circuit; Overhead (engineering); Embedded system; Reduction (mathematics); Critical path method; Correctness; Logic synthesis; Logic gate; Computer hardware; Algorithm; Engineering; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001945039,0.0004930242,0.0002663615,0.0005044069,0.0002256602,0.0005053959,0.0005656061,0.0001920848,0.001518421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007338343,0.0001703334,0.0003196677,0.0003966599,0.0003159513,0.000888493,0.000306402,0.0003615084,0.0001862162],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000547551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007929497,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001485033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002497798,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997591,0.0000446876,0.00001510457,0.00004218121,0.00009606155,0.00004283444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995996,0.0001492384,0.00005397646,0.00009346197,0.00008997197,0.00001378998],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007168415,0.0001110338,0.004432375,0.0002830326,0.0000655224,0.0006634222,0.0001375468,0.2532408,0.2801564,0.01658901,0.002331781,0.4412723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004455353,0.0004617685,0.001557913,0.00003196663,0.0001203067,0.0004005159,0.00004802509,0.8797901,0.1039768,0.008826991,0.004718185,0.00002300427],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3815125,0.001311054,0.6057388,0.0002254879,0.00006630379,0.00007375829,0.0001141463,0.00302706,0.007930887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.878214,0.0002863742,0.1196519,0.00007098034,0.00001545664,0.0000217525,0.0001011585,0.00007886144,0.001559494],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001518421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005079627,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03104311781249176,"score_gpt":0.2289209234772367,"score_spread":0.1978778056647449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}