{"id":"W2034981868","doi":"10.1007/s11225-014-9564-1","title":"Gentzen and Jaśkowski Natural Deduction: Fundamentally Similar but Importantly Different","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studia Logica","topic":"Logic, programming, and type systems","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Natural deduction; Normalization (sociology); Mathematics; Sequent calculus; Epistemology; Calculus (dental); Semantics (computer science); Meaning (existential); Linguistics; Philosophy; Algebra over a field; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Pure mathematics; Programming language; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003703706,0.0006348402,0.001372744,0.002172079,0.002439197,0.006285293,0.002006652,0.002063529,0.004206175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01068697,0.0008985085,0.001780289,0.002425395,0.01203185,0.01769237,0.005431055,0.006481477,0.001156631],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002722471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001875043,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002548642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002602835,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967189,0.001373988,0.0001975859,0.0006193955,0.0008347807,0.0002552262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958854,0.002058589,0.0001587273,0.001162956,0.0005188876,0.0002153479],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001357953,0.000009745392,0.00009735837,0.00002509304,0.000008607686,0.00001235476,0.0002174205,0.0001701359,0.00008490607,0.9953819,0.000841097,0.003137812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000615296,0.000003744665,0.0001138624,0.000008532637,0.000008960593,0.00002342609,0.0000501012,0.0005032716,0.0001044408,0.9952799,0.003891017,0.00000661834],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.111967,0.01947002,0.6128904,0.04800564,0.002168098,0.0001627045,0.000697123,0.000718148,0.2039209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7950282,0.007107703,0.1573426,0.006321827,0.001434117,0.000174122,0.0007372228,0.0005676307,0.0312866],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006285293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01975298,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01875987037559582,"score_gpt":0.235310530650576,"score_spread":0.2165506602749802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}