{"id":"W2035114355","doi":"10.1016/j.psep.2010.01.004","title":"Modelling of BP Texas City refinery accident using dynamic risk assessment approach","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","topic":"Risk and Safety Analysis","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":157,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Near miss; Refinery; Risk assessment; Event (particle physics); Engineering; Process (computing); Risk analysis (engineering); Process safety; Accident (philosophy); Forensic engineering; Computer science; Operations management; Computer security; Work in process; Business; Waste management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003526564,0.000837981,0.0009540283,0.0008365792,0.0008360792,0.001356121,0.001666847,0.00200681,0.005755508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008165116,0.0006971383,0.00113627,0.0005622652,0.0005539691,0.0008139504,0.0006246807,0.0009778735,0.0003799756],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002057937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001927765,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1478219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0547079,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997844,0.00006161959,0.00001039684,0.00003582686,0.00004491163,0.00006288577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996067,0.0002079175,0.00005148017,0.00001445039,0.0000846921,0.00003480048],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001717014,0.000009817447,0.0002101292,0.000007709029,0.000006079373,0.00004362979,0.00001395555,0.998021,0.0001932459,0.0009234921,0.00008480698,0.0004690065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004799219,0.000009220051,0.0001579783,0.000001964435,0.000005120385,0.000006929466,0.00001128514,0.9993285,0.00008089782,0.0002820008,0.0001066591,0.000004571013],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7690983,0.0005341342,0.1693885,0.001009415,0.0001575876,0.0002098212,0.001681234,0.0005859562,0.05733504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9830198,0.0001787902,0.004452455,0.00003156157,0.00001953791,0.00005666538,0.0002168191,0.00004880652,0.01197566],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1478219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2939231,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06029132334324324,"score_gpt":0.3179673670240569,"score_spread":0.2576760436808136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}