{"id":"W2035115717","doi":"10.1109/hicss.2014.488","title":"IT Capability Configurations for Innovation: An Empirical Study of Industrial SMEs","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Equifinality; Innovation management; Contingency; Resource (disambiguation); Product (mathematics); Empirical research; Business; Industrial organization; Competitive advantage; Globalization; Product innovation; New product development; Contingency theory; Knowledge management; Dynamic capabilities; Computer science; Marketing; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002339941,0.0002492054,0.0003843351,0.003245683,0.003053125,0.002270772,0.0007316606,0.0007580229,0.001937436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01383636,0.000287876,0.0002764408,0.005636013,0.002114656,0.001567431,0.001829926,0.0007661562,0.0001734495],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006883142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01206566,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4808633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5348442,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985728,0.0003027949,0.00009192774,0.0000984907,0.0003846488,0.0005493962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990405,0.004033463,0.001906896,0.0003028879,0.002128931,0.001222907],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001445583,0.0004177577,0.8864463,0.0001108929,0.00002262181,0.0006284999,0.0931899,0.0003791533,0.0007293922,0.002192245,0.0003006573,0.015438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001350175,0.0001756888,0.8249227,0.00009394785,0.00002229577,0.0002128541,0.1710949,0.0009054358,0.0002354266,0.0004186068,0.001877823,0.00002683705],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988979,0.00003486906,0.0000217811,0.00002529258,2.453169e-7,0.00001255237,0.00001755316,5.998535e-7,0.0009892022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997198,0.00006143794,0.00005116392,0.00001106282,5.264992e-7,0.00001005034,0.0000239728,4.56282e-7,0.0001215],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4808633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9561287,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1154213457617428,"score_gpt":0.3379317840538432,"score_spread":0.2225104382921004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}