{"id":"W2035142301","doi":"10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00284.x","title":"Designatable Units for Status Assessment of Endangered Species","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Biology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":191,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Endangered species; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Conservation status; Wildlife; Biodiversity; Listing (finance); Geography; Taxon; Wildlife trade; Wildlife conservation; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Biology; Business; Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001742761,0.00005412463,0.0001039555,0.00002404476,0.00009288266,0.000002256273,0.00006193074,0.00005301302,0.0006861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001194525,0.00004977932,0.00001575745,0.0001142807,0.0002031586,0.00006922294,0.0000413888,0.00003159656,0.00001640311],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007044225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002701078,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004332255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009536451,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995016,0.00004354378,0.0001632233,0.0001183967,0.00003022506,0.0001429593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994999,0.0002630696,0.00009932872,0.00007488342,0.00004330034,0.0000195358],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001112264,0.00003344162,0.9487879,0.000005430133,0.00001802,5.706432e-8,0.0001638434,0.0006466175,0.01971708,0.02509854,0.003624649,0.001893308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003979879,0.0001083898,0.8799847,0.000001795982,0.000009364035,4.321839e-7,0.00008576739,0.01468889,0.001687342,0.002320744,0.1006428,0.00007186942],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.900477,0.00009377683,0.08302256,0.002901971,0.0001620659,0.0003762715,0.00009133868,0.00002976032,0.01284528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734654,0.00005719951,0.02422714,0.0006440414,0.00001674024,0.00004853637,0.00009112761,0.000003291705,0.001446457],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09701811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7512314,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0472223376947026,"score_gpt":0.2991080262490207,"score_spread":0.2518856885543181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}