{"id":"W2035174482","doi":"10.1139/t06-053","title":"Evaluation of relative density profiles of sand fill at a reclaimed site","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Nanyang Technological University","keywords":"Relative density; Land reclamation; Geotechnical engineering; Penetration test; Cone penetration test; Compressibility; Bulk density; Geology; Environmental science; Soil science; Soil water; Materials science; Mechanics; Composite material; Geography; Physics; Subgrade","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001041526,0.0001207654,0.0002250764,0.0002116172,0.00006996149,0.000009179576,0.0001106841,0.0002227763,0.0001218554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003907306,0.0001199684,0.00009688892,0.000290585,0.00007013659,0.00008913629,0.00001474092,0.0003277907,0.000005861483],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006609676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001981436,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003145105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003988964,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998657,0.00007031159,0.0004467651,0.0001081591,0.0004688411,0.0002488722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990261,0.00006162294,0.00009128881,0.0001779872,0.0004359437,0.0002070223],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004728931,0.00001044724,0.0003228387,0.00002416421,0.0000246563,0.000004442046,0.00002877509,0.9846034,0.01127084,0.0002031549,0.00099181,0.002510755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007457737,0.00008681797,0.03219037,0.0001769807,0.0001944568,0.0001174329,0.00001043454,0.9356765,0.02375201,0.005013969,0.001743651,0.0002916552],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9830856,0.0007262868,0.01349208,0.0001162617,0.0001566312,0.0002487543,0.00004654634,0.00008942097,0.002038467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994774,0.00002410963,0.0003633659,0.000005327156,0.00005277765,0.000006082158,0.00001870437,0.00001985679,0.00003232272],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04892694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.489217,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01216220600598258,"score_gpt":0.2056615582407451,"score_spread":0.1934993522347626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}