{"id":"W2035174482","doi":"10.1139/t06-053","title":"Evaluation of relative density profiles of sand fill at a reclaimed site","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Nanyang Technological University","keywords":"Relative density; Land reclamation; Geotechnical engineering; Penetration test; Cone penetration test; Compressibility; Bulk density; Geology; Environmental science; Soil science; Soil water; Materials science; Mechanics; Composite material; Geography; Physics; Subgrade","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001423451,0.0002130153,0.0001884575,0.0008809864,0.0002089974,0.0002757044,0.0002800718,0.0001665428,0.0009227343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003828446,0.0001572937,0.000128118,0.0004043537,0.0002371444,0.0001984563,0.0002128851,0.0001601553,0.0002510573],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003044774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001920514,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005843143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01703538,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997738,0.00001663723,0.000008558529,0.00003309068,0.0001409923,0.00002690626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996482,0.0000620869,0.00007598483,0.0000177666,0.0001655253,0.00003032397],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005142419,0.00013487,0.2984295,0.0001142254,0.0000403082,0.0006283519,0.001559065,0.004056351,0.646922,0.0002434516,0.0001703179,0.04718732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001118203,0.0006494477,0.7509026,0.00001511655,0.00002694318,0.0005317603,0.001245704,0.01160915,0.2340274,0.00005623409,0.0008804479,0.00004392612],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979437,0.00001805942,0.001254758,0.000002897032,9.139156e-7,0.000006753965,0.00008802571,0.00003379277,0.0006510795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985334,0.00002006265,0.0009175963,0.000001759821,4.309436e-7,0.00000458572,0.000105588,0.000006861093,0.0004097026],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005843143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01161826,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01216220600598258,"score_gpt":0.2056615582407451,"score_spread":0.1934993522347626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}