{"id":"W2035301386","doi":"10.1016/j.jlp.2005.06.022","title":"I2SI: A comprehensive quantitative tool for inherent safety and cost evaluation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries","topic":"Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":187,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Hazard; Process (computing); Hazard analysis; Reliability engineering; Risk analysis (engineering); Process safety; Identification (biology); Inherent safety; Computer science; Engineering; Work in process; Operations research; Operations management; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001800213,0.000104752,0.000226508,0.000195725,0.0001866615,0.00007066453,0.0002114223,0.0000979686,0.00004613029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000747818,0.00007436373,0.0000456439,0.0002746365,0.0002468193,0.0004372609,0.000030715,0.0002253665,0.000003780556],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008086234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000110629,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001184621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001492141,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985587,0.0002165105,0.0005787556,0.0001233792,0.0003806695,0.0001420065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998316,0.0003150914,0.000684707,0.00009246301,0.000572818,0.00001891412],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007073806,0.002804636,0.081467,0.0009183599,0.0007902482,0.00002104433,0.1006932,0.02323093,0.03327356,0.06411888,0.01726912,0.6683392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02968414,0.005364651,0.359515,0.002305064,0.001288265,0.001008549,0.1906585,0.007705762,0.05987776,0.2111991,0.129631,0.001762198],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924622,0.00137578,0.001375588,0.00377681,0.0001316843,0.0007944914,0.00002237689,0.0000125868,0.00004849224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984667,0.0001953034,0.001059633,0.00009457119,0.00006997397,0.00007370333,0.000002491702,0.000007131334,0.00003053269],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.666577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3032465,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08663135863223341,"score_gpt":0.387810514022652,"score_spread":0.3011791553904186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}