{"id":"W2035301386","doi":"10.1016/j.jlp.2005.06.022","title":"I2SI: A comprehensive quantitative tool for inherent safety and cost evaluation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries","topic":"Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":187,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Hazard; Process (computing); Hazard analysis; Reliability engineering; Risk analysis (engineering); Process safety; Identification (biology); Inherent safety; Computer science; Engineering; Work in process; Operations research; Operations management; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006692335,0.001915875,0.001177586,0.007151411,0.000492841,0.002541284,0.00172138,0.0008135468,0.0107265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02015459,0.0005464996,0.00116798,0.004557037,0.0005153364,0.002594738,0.001559662,0.0008071774,0.001646069],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009267768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002098965,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003156305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003742623,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950989,0.001310163,0.0003115678,0.0002155434,0.002893704,0.0001701174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864061,0.007680196,0.001174914,0.001463802,0.003041215,0.0002337074],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005890357,0.000736473,0.02119423,0.001323629,0.0005510833,0.0001705305,0.0004109439,0.1855929,0.0118909,0.0838569,0.04077886,0.6529045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001383375,0.001055892,0.01263448,0.0002759326,0.0003665392,0.000497034,0.0004595389,0.8146929,0.02722501,0.08286085,0.05952407,0.0002694676],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02623161,0.0002958563,0.9424645,0.0001882436,0.00006274072,0.0003642346,0.006048932,0.008547512,0.01579635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2372768,0.0002618658,0.7494778,0.000103067,0.00004654336,0.0008435682,0.005749756,0.001361614,0.004878998],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0107265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03588367,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08663135863223341,"score_gpt":0.387810514022652,"score_spread":0.3011791553904186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}