{"id":"W2035411037","doi":"10.1016/j.actamat.2011.12.036","title":"Electromechanical response of piezoelectric foams","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Materialia","topic":"Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research","field":"Engineering","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Materials science; Piezoelectricity; Composite material; Figure of merit; Dielectric; Porosity; Volume fraction; Acoustic impedance; Piezoelectric coefficient; Hydrostatic equilibrium; Hydrostatic pressure; Electrical impedance; Optoelectronics; Mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005969795,0.000115348,0.0001799718,0.0001122713,0.00002034417,0.00001931601,0.0001962613,0.00007711256,0.0006615117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000129411,0.0001107627,0.00003183907,0.0002223347,0.00002161861,0.0001402219,0.00004884267,0.00009634082,0.0001333446],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001018391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001963452,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006460648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.440836e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998891,0.00008309996,0.0002071548,0.00008836245,0.000199406,0.0005309891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995106,0.00005854517,0.00002331945,0.0002622232,0.00002729643,0.0001179786],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002155828,0.00003128243,0.00007678127,0.0000470711,0.00002697973,0.000001191672,0.00006735206,0.000003489188,0.9945489,0.0005508872,0.00408681,0.0003436723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000652397,0.0003080663,0.007181711,0.00001980742,0.00003461318,0.00003140336,0.00004730875,0.00348669,0.9796627,0.000537176,0.007658537,0.0003796626],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955029,0.0001011175,0.002558066,0.00003794731,0.0008401723,0.0001262437,0.00001344452,0.0001448697,0.0006752371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985623,0.00001689397,0.0007513495,0.000009590187,0.0002141407,0.00001774791,0.000005514835,0.00004359465,0.0003788283],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01488627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7243089,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0140747998458412,"score_gpt":0.2411198387209626,"score_spread":0.2270450388751214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}