{"id":"W2035479298","doi":"10.1139/f09-070","title":"How reliable are the abundance indices derived from commercial catch–effort standardization?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Standardization; Stock assessment; Fishing; Stock (firearms); Statistics; Abundance (ecology); Econometrics; Catch per unit effort; Environmental science; Fishery; Mathematics; Computer science; Geography; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06997321,0.001391236,0.001714301,0.005957157,0.0006590921,0.004510311,0.002106789,0.002320605,0.001636951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2674921,0.0009033961,0.001731181,0.007632243,0.00343923,0.006735285,0.001731086,0.001748096,0.002136415],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009374021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001100578,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007913901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007782112,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9686983,0.01525466,0.00476298,0.005156373,0.005413866,0.0007138051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8450077,0.06280471,0.02508888,0.0300258,0.03605823,0.001014804],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002547989,0.0001192838,0.6225317,0.000720449,0.002348752,0.0001513535,0.002175624,0.007126138,0.002569518,0.008706593,0.01279113,0.3405047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001177668,0.0004105235,0.8468685,0.001045251,0.0009096395,0.0009285068,0.003027462,0.0541167,0.01049232,0.04053644,0.04103344,0.0005134638],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6052794,0.009053079,0.3372914,0.006676404,0.002136532,0.0003788623,0.008681247,0.002256431,0.02824654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9102132,0.00204998,0.07802672,0.001038912,0.0006126817,0.0003184439,0.005045289,0.0007073262,0.001987382],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06997321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3700581,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01815470586333926,"score_gpt":0.2302009044902905,"score_spread":0.2120461986269513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}