{"id":"W2035688764","doi":"10.1061/(asce)0733-9453(2008)134:3(67)","title":"Efficient Dual-Frequency Ambiguity Resolution Algorithm for GPS-Based Attitude Determination","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Surveying Engineering","topic":"GNSS positioning and interference","field":"Engineering","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of Calgary","keywords":"Ambiguity resolution; Ambiguity; Kinematics; Baseline (sea); Dual (grammatical number); Computer science; Reliability (semiconductor); Global Positioning System; Resolution (logic); Algorithm; Artificial intelligence; Telecommunications; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004215422,0.0004774113,0.0004354356,0.0008081579,0.0002860992,0.0004948041,0.0007326685,0.0004129479,0.001396363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001417065,0.000310156,0.0003291191,0.0007280175,0.0001793094,0.0006792034,0.0007777813,0.0006382004,0.001361629],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002252138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004979467,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009828816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001176946,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996061,0.00005769308,0.00001833212,0.00007485481,0.0002006031,0.00004253749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996428,0.00006724416,0.00005246149,0.00007634507,0.0001433712,0.00001772147],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002938704,0.00009585711,0.002498313,0.0001142656,0.00004017427,0.0001191391,0.0001608872,0.05474427,0.1050932,0.006905494,0.002437448,0.827497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006771159,0.0001509452,0.002537023,0.00001645716,0.00003604561,0.0003686343,0.0000399415,0.9388184,0.04673455,0.002893042,0.008297583,0.00003965052],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.02787717,0.0002150659,0.9701198,0.00004214644,0.00003879118,0.0000199205,0.00004027594,0.0004651802,0.001181709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2240008,0.0001565404,0.7736407,0.00003855627,0.000041006,0.00004413244,0.0002355604,0.00004210232,0.001800683],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001396363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004671276,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02652516263597629,"score_gpt":0.2396919682880583,"score_spread":0.213166805652082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}