{"id":"W2035688764","doi":"10.1061/(asce)0733-9453(2008)134:3(67)","title":"Efficient Dual-Frequency Ambiguity Resolution Algorithm for GPS-Based Attitude Determination","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Surveying Engineering","topic":"GNSS positioning and interference","field":"Engineering","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of Calgary","keywords":"Ambiguity resolution; Ambiguity; Kinematics; Baseline (sea); Dual (grammatical number); Computer science; Reliability (semiconductor); Global Positioning System; Resolution (logic); Algorithm; Artificial intelligence; Telecommunications; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005622684,0.00013859,0.0001988899,0.0002325928,0.00008281257,0.00002657623,0.0001056209,0.00006984857,0.000003372907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001518153,0.0001431686,0.0001144833,0.0001495009,0.00001569707,0.0001078944,0.000007451404,0.000215152,0.00000239488],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002094944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003314458,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008323542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001818942,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999052,0.00002124846,0.0004008849,0.00008954045,0.0002146687,0.0002216638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993601,0.0001356309,0.00009478749,0.0001044603,0.0002280812,0.00007688769],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004900014,0.00003111374,0.0003607021,0.00006786468,0.00002360923,0.00001982135,0.0001028572,0.9804967,0.01538318,0.00001367544,0.0001291928,0.003366377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004067749,0.00009416135,0.01641412,0.0002078554,0.00001427749,0.0001693844,0.000004193902,0.9742255,0.00821237,0.000006620113,0.00009046272,0.0001543307],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3918973,0.0001809632,0.6070834,0.00001010282,0.000625063,0.00005362396,0.000007554053,0.00008282123,0.00005919228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9245862,0.00001898822,0.07515658,0.000005688071,0.000180369,0.000007260945,0.000005623726,0.00002966735,0.000009562599],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.532689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5838247,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02652516263597629,"score_gpt":0.2396919682880583,"score_spread":0.213166805652082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}