{"id":"W2035692078","doi":"10.1111/j.1759-3441.2006.tb00410.x","title":"NEW ZEALAND LESSONS FOR AUSTRALIAN WORKPLACE REFORM: A CRITIQUE OF 151 ACADEMICS","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Papers A journal of applied economics and policy","topic":"New Zealand Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Productivity; Unemployment; Government (linguistics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Labour economics; Work (physics); Inequality; Inflation (cosmology); Population; Political science; Australian population; Public administration; Relation (database); Demographic economics; Economics; Economic growth; Law; Sociology; Geography; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04948308,0.0008185168,0.001475642,0.004522656,0.01481407,0.01543006,0.005572543,0.01728353,0.008013268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07471207,0.0008847779,0.001397887,0.006442011,0.03089947,0.01130853,0.01232048,0.02566585,0.001251057],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0593284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09199967,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3928711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3683572,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9622787,0.01243263,0.002430315,0.00283727,0.01578839,0.004232768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9687358,0.01343816,0.002239972,0.001450865,0.009948492,0.004186747],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000679256,0.0001248752,0.001405148,0.0008981357,0.00003673878,0.0005138858,0.0449057,0.0003313118,0.0001775703,0.6009502,0.2869693,0.06361929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005810164,0.00005378922,0.004974481,0.001345999,0.0000411409,0.0001279673,0.01535032,0.0002509432,0.0001278282,0.06409436,0.9135051,0.00007001961],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003628276,0.01622546,0.0003671071,0.9414103,0.002159771,0.00002550117,0.00003167162,0.00001311941,0.03613882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2449456,0.03808598,0.002923226,0.6297395,0.007287442,0.0003892897,0.00007814068,0.0001349429,0.07641581],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3928711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7811688,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02303097643040422,"score_gpt":0.2613880545592662,"score_spread":0.2383570781288619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}