{"id":"W2035775203","doi":"10.1505/146554813807700074","title":"Fiscal policy and its implication for community forestry in Nepal","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Forestry Review","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Community forestry; Forestry; Fiscal policy; Economics; Natural resource economics; Geography; Forest management; Macroeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003352827,0.0001778789,0.0003296357,0.001749442,0.001375227,0.005381129,0.000681016,0.0009385215,0.003339869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005193749,0.0001535917,0.0002240414,0.002060693,0.001431446,0.002093307,0.001494274,0.001326798,0.0002253792],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004556799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0118175,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02465961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03872329,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984646,0.0007783743,0.0001280368,0.0001086853,0.0003180175,0.0002022686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961085,0.002299097,0.0005769864,0.00005828474,0.0008568662,0.0001002685],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000171689,0.0001900035,0.01622665,0.0245328,0.0002771599,0.003271001,0.009295658,0.004445502,0.001139549,0.2598028,0.04463731,0.6360098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034298,0.0001485455,0.03383189,0.02619349,0.0002210404,0.001680704,0.01202793,0.0006693665,0.001230115,0.02275907,0.9011304,0.0000732263],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04567912,0.8164367,0.0006204053,0.03960927,0.0006300746,0.00006471844,0.0001671246,0.00002090465,0.09677162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4444125,0.5356188,0.001057478,0.007640181,0.0003871829,0.0001043252,0.0001376103,0.0000114063,0.01063046],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02465961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04903215,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03496668494631758,"score_gpt":0.2828609596294027,"score_spread":0.2478942746830851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}