{"id":"W2035775203","doi":"10.1505/146554813807700074","title":"Fiscal policy and its implication for community forestry in Nepal","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Forestry Review","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Community forestry; Forestry; Fiscal policy; Economics; Natural resource economics; Geography; Forest management; Macroeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003151986,0.00007136037,0.00007942797,0.00002151064,0.0001512542,0.00003162889,0.0004204973,0.00002485318,0.0003831869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001325917,0.00004989679,0.0000394839,0.00009646035,0.00008889673,0.0001229079,0.0003572272,0.0001000005,0.0001262506],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009646806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005879352,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002400813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002626666,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994428,0.00004641957,0.0001571648,0.0001008201,0.000145474,0.0001073279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996232,0.0001037709,0.0000665958,0.0001593325,0.00001334803,0.00003371255],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000191235,0.0001453078,0.9214277,0.0004841552,0.00004044432,6.739432e-7,0.0003428809,0.00009608284,0.0002180278,0.006160239,0.02164938,0.04941604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001695155,0.00001633944,0.9211173,0.0001365893,0.00001123695,0.000005057961,0.00006740315,0.001478351,0.0000165866,0.004532127,0.07238142,0.00006803947],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9565544,0.000922929,0.00003583629,0.03555344,0.00004586641,0.0008856051,0.00001470027,0.00001283196,0.005974429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914548,0.003250991,0.0001172792,0.003343049,0.0000712879,0.0001613117,0.00004930593,0.000005202604,0.00154673],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05073204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4195628,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03496668494631758,"score_gpt":0.2828609596294027,"score_spread":0.2478942746830851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}