{"id":"W2035786153","doi":"10.1177/154193120204601601","title":"Clinical Evidence at the Point of Care in Acute Medicine: A Handheld Usability Case Study","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting","topic":"Health Sciences Research and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Usability; USable; Point of care; Mobile device; Computer science; Evidence-based medicine; Set (abstract data type); Cognitive walkthrough; User interface; Point (geometry); Heuristic evaluation; Human–computer interaction; Medicine; Multimedia; World Wide Web; Alternative medicine; Nursing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005387586,0.0001307381,0.0003658058,0.00003033073,0.001552639,0.00001108977,0.0003746438,0.0001236757,0.00005250924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001825922,0.00006952984,0.0001225688,0.0002692337,0.0006982615,0.000250916,0.0005024226,0.0006898831,0.000001154925],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002524917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001039931,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004630677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001784472,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978172,0.0001657401,0.001008949,0.0003216829,0.0002726236,0.0004138002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971224,0.001564672,0.0005828098,0.0001664169,0.0004152091,0.0001484751],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002840292,0.00005773027,0.7377754,0.0003136617,0.00001285883,1.928707e-7,0.2584078,9.473427e-7,0.0001142528,0.00001252959,0.003112491,0.0001636997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003961113,0.0004393947,0.350776,0.000490027,0.00002714186,0.00000302347,0.6474194,0.0001473344,0.00005095817,0.00004417387,0.0001358894,0.00007050113],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967288,0.0004608544,1.584951e-7,0.001272993,0.0002570098,0.00101372,0.0000124138,0.000008465994,0.0002456014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990268,0.0004185324,0.00004971307,0.0001563731,0.0001490011,0.00003503792,4.420574e-7,0.000007747021,0.000156333],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3890116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997472,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1705000697103693,"score_gpt":0.4662110754941562,"score_spread":0.295711005783787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}