{"id":"W2035786153","doi":"10.1177/154193120204601601","title":"Clinical Evidence at the Point of Care in Acute Medicine: A Handheld Usability Case Study","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting","topic":"Health Sciences Research and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Usability; USable; Point of care; Mobile device; Computer science; Evidence-based medicine; Set (abstract data type); Cognitive walkthrough; User interface; Point (geometry); Heuristic evaluation; Human–computer interaction; Medicine; Multimedia; World Wide Web; Alternative medicine; Nursing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01630634,0.0008208511,0.0008501047,0.002572338,0.003282462,0.002748503,0.001872729,0.004317746,0.00272663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07273781,0.0006416573,0.0009854279,0.002014219,0.002171096,0.002077494,0.002208051,0.001476571,0.0005725138],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002007839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001312826,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002120174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003218923,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9720007,0.02185487,0.00218341,0.000763629,0.002394948,0.0008024712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8960352,0.09024201,0.003460692,0.003623521,0.004009809,0.002628699],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00556343,0.02308427,0.1493022,0.009922934,0.0007921184,0.2243034,0.1914201,0.009615423,0.01841641,0.009264525,0.009313119,0.3490021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003935591,0.06884006,0.1626465,0.006243357,0.001513702,0.3662394,0.1935426,0.04540962,0.03933716,0.009835746,0.1011329,0.001323342],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.977316,0.001321331,0.01162837,0.001895171,0.00006052478,0.001573914,0.0001187584,0.00009841546,0.005987541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.976644,0.001129629,0.01962373,0.0004805064,0.0000630194,0.0006773778,0.00007583237,0.00003538802,0.001270564],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01630634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08623719,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1705000697103693,"score_gpt":0.4662110754941562,"score_spread":0.295711005783787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}