{"id":"W2035847107","doi":"10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.200","title":"U.S. Department of Energy’s Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership Program: Overview","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Energy Procedia","topic":"CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Carbon sequestration; Carbon capture and storage (timeline); General partnership; Environmental science; Fossil fuel; Scale (ratio); Business; Greenhouse gas; Capital cost; Environmental resource management; Environmental protection; Engineering; Waste management; Climate change; Geography; Carbon dioxide; Finance; Cartography; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007353741,0.001367058,0.0005200704,0.00341523,0.001764597,0.00443059,0.00264406,0.002186134,0.01672425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002990123,0.000705698,0.0006819324,0.006249788,0.0005470041,0.002830388,0.003936192,0.002336379,0.006300943],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005929855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05272895,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1326962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.149056,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967161,0.0005495351,0.0001042048,0.0002056811,0.001607462,0.0008169832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962929,0.0001695155,0.0001862193,0.0001330804,0.00227249,0.0009457214],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009047421,0.0003630263,0.004808359,0.001292809,0.00005002516,0.0001176287,0.0001494561,0.00179199,0.0006389513,0.0162028,0.7260053,0.2484892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002252502,0.00005035142,0.005130732,0.0004260633,0.00001695104,0.00005483602,0.000202221,0.0002555174,0.000348668,0.001944093,0.9915301,0.00001804743],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01059413,0.07324588,0.02095435,0.1424025,0.004815055,0.009018131,0.09877662,0.00365075,0.6365425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1181286,0.2167957,0.1343239,0.05578955,0.001604529,0.01095447,0.1584237,0.00211539,0.3018641],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1326962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2638476,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03343280792507961,"score_gpt":0.2888669938416688,"score_spread":0.2554341859165891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}