{"id":"W2035847107","doi":"10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.200","title":"U.S. Department of Energy’s Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership Program: Overview","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Energy Procedia","topic":"CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Carbon sequestration; Carbon capture and storage (timeline); General partnership; Environmental science; Fossil fuel; Scale (ratio); Business; Greenhouse gas; Capital cost; Environmental resource management; Environmental protection; Engineering; Waste management; Climate change; Geography; Carbon dioxide; Finance; Cartography; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008085222,0.0001191658,0.0001059038,0.00002165872,0.00004991553,0.00001510618,0.0001073815,0.0000710569,0.0003970441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001838868,0.0001085401,0.00005525235,0.0001793456,0.00007085044,0.0001023561,0.00002104086,0.000053103,0.000009446032],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007804559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003760405,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002811423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008517538,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990762,0.00004000282,0.0002239584,0.0002298093,0.0002509637,0.0001789953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996188,0.00001494245,0.0001124561,0.0001538228,0.00002106156,0.00007896312],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002818047,0.002857151,0.02928952,0.00003753352,0.00007762193,0.0000454644,0.00073904,0.00571449,0.01422173,0.6084287,0.06474053,0.2735665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005729066,0.001579103,0.1046014,0.00005535778,0.00004778544,0.00006477037,0.00006481335,0.003222881,0.02358153,0.02641512,0.8392193,0.000574938],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3869584,0.0007476012,0.0006609978,0.006071436,0.0003517464,0.0004709338,0.000006048399,0.0004443892,0.6042885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955751,0.000141334,0.000737331,0.0009321683,0.00008864835,0.00006447088,0.00008402926,0.000004998739,0.002371867],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7744789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4426135,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03343280792507961,"score_gpt":0.2888669938416688,"score_spread":0.2554341859165891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}