{"id":"W2035962961","doi":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.01.003","title":"The use of noise equivalent count rate and the NEMA phantom for PET image quality evaluation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physica Medica","topic":"Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications","field":"Medicine","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Imaging phantom; Image quality; Consistency (knowledge bases); Noise (video); Image (mathematics); Physics; Signal-to-noise ratio (imaging); Computer science; Optics; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005112715,0.000637852,0.000654501,0.001472508,0.0003660732,0.002383149,0.0007597922,0.001096535,0.001973231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02175263,0.000461177,0.0005124848,0.0008884553,0.0007044127,0.001259935,0.000822049,0.0006793105,0.0005418339],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006743874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000864824,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001635839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002221595,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976667,0.001137355,0.0001447109,0.0002992339,0.0006825626,0.00006942758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932733,0.003825693,0.0007279339,0.0006871392,0.001322742,0.0001631728],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004342345,0.0002295607,0.03166529,0.001067748,0.0003986177,0.001241018,0.000890902,0.01649334,0.6974818,0.009660897,0.001056746,0.2354718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001447444,0.001265623,0.1103839,0.0003809832,0.001009217,0.013734,0.0005322994,0.301089,0.5494037,0.004219331,0.01739132,0.0004459768],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2951745,0.00846897,0.6789773,0.0005268367,0.0002354656,0.0003164499,0.0006729911,0.002121746,0.01350578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7186384,0.001756666,0.2744398,0.0001790031,0.00003520769,0.0001475197,0.0004241899,0.0007051948,0.003673944],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005112715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02703899,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1991020654179582,"score_gpt":0.443636308130917,"score_spread":0.2445342427129588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}