{"id":"W2036099931","doi":"10.1093/ecam/nem186","title":"Evaluating the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials that Examine the Efficacy of Natural Health Products: A Systematic Review of Critical Appraisal Instruments","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Dalhousie University","keywords":"Blinding; Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials; Generalizability theory; Data extraction; Randomized controlled trial; Critical appraisal; Systematic review; Medicine; Research design; Descriptive statistics; Psychological intervention; Quality (philosophy); Alternative medicine; Psychology; MEDLINE; Medical physics; Statistics; Nursing; Surgery","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","metaepi_broad","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.7853572,0.0009791951,0.08255769,0.0006648586,0.0002228096,0.00008831792,0.003357299,0.00005506642,0.00190488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8300758,0.0002638153,0.007693685,0.001804824,0.001968408,0.0002002551,0.0003047848,0.0005633259,0.000006594355],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008824542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006607016,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003096036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001088743,"domain_scores_codex":[0.4175365,0.4595769,0.09860901,0.001952829,0.02167355,0.0006511977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.105303,0.7802765,0.1048636,0.004914411,0.004437194,0.0002052512],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003108535,0.0001562609,0.00002121084,0.9092883,0.005735076,0.000001127468,0.0005403494,0.000001267184,0.000002364837,0.001740315,0.000688604,0.0787166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03810114,0.0006214039,0.00001739224,0.9272445,0.03023554,0.0000120404,0.0007947343,0.0006472522,0.000005602691,0.0002545542,0.001827479,0.0002383116],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001921398,0.9611468,0.001708833,0.006827425,0.0009869088,0.02899106,0.0001167052,0.00000299966,0.0000271289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01249703,0.9841567,0.0008009684,0.001015334,0.0003590412,0.0009895883,0.00008689341,0.0000201021,0.00007438528],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3206996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999814,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9298914764152793,"score_gpt":0.7085601668502389,"score_spread":0.2213313095650403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}