{"id":"W2036169157","doi":"10.3389/fmicb.2014.00282","title":"Antibiotics in Canadian poultry productions and anticipated alternatives","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Frontiers in Microbiology","topic":"Animal Nutrition and Physiology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":300,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Cranberry Institute; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Poultry Research Council","keywords":"Antibiotics; Biosecurity; Biotechnology; Antimicrobial; Antibiotic resistance; Biology; Poultry farming; Animal feed; Microbiology; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007992781,0.0004297366,0.0001839953,0.002054518,0.002579954,0.002086547,0.000891913,0.000772314,0.006397359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00134166,0.0001985426,0.0004395162,0.003219456,0.0008757263,0.000558046,0.0005876457,0.000802376,0.0004506542],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0673086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05685101,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9839987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9925373,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984941,0.00007899822,0.00005396219,0.0001599012,0.0007821786,0.0004308803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979955,0.00008245134,0.0001869816,0.00003463258,0.001135927,0.0005644933],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001684893,0.0004484104,0.2398456,0.003249712,0.0001072847,0.009045664,0.004439394,0.002410443,0.03622618,0.02983624,0.07256288,0.6001434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003704428,0.0002712804,0.4668145,0.0007114271,0.00006096279,0.001318343,0.005454839,0.000600561,0.002537452,0.0005854737,0.5215151,0.00009291356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.5690374,0.1260059,0.001588865,0.04981016,0.001518779,0.0002921736,0.009723515,0.0002580239,0.2417652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8415373,0.07483853,0.004278321,0.005199508,0.0001853361,0.0000534476,0.002686384,0.00004362171,0.07117759],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0673086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4883604,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02528810536272289,"score_gpt":0.2730358654796045,"score_spread":0.2477477601168816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}