{"id":"W2036208050","doi":"10.1007/s11367-011-0358-7","title":"Environmental footprints of British Columbia wood pellets from a simplified life cycle analysis","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Pellets; Tonne; Environmental science; Life-cycle assessment; Raw material; Renewable energy; Carbon footprint; Pellet; Waste management; Greenhouse gas; Bioenergy; Environmental engineering; Biomass (ecology); Energy source; Engineering; Pulp and paper industry; Production (economics); Biofuel; Coal; Agronomy; Ecology; Materials science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007103214,0.0001481986,0.0003875347,0.00005546978,0.00009184692,0.0001014172,0.00115703,0.0000687776,0.01422393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009531325,0.0001586173,0.0003607048,0.0001823912,0.0003543179,0.0003428387,0.0005664871,0.0002732316,0.00003813143],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005881318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006965426,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02006016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003311334,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971501,0.0001732809,0.0008712939,0.000253207,0.001298599,0.0002535253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984044,0.000135638,0.0007834038,0.0003504157,0.00002976784,0.0002964021],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001347377,0.001336313,0.9794375,0.000002783117,0.001740842,0.0000656851,0.0008852546,0.003701984,0.002199708,0.000008636679,0.0009338738,0.009552647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008362578,0.0001395456,0.9930371,0.00001176526,0.0002839054,0.00001868073,0.001830165,0.001247347,0.0002160329,0.001921915,0.0003004374,0.0001568402],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951046,0.00005470835,0.0008323621,0.0002795513,0.0002258656,0.0001590004,0.0001218343,0.000007619122,0.003214439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976546,0.00009228455,0.001483104,0.0004562513,0.00009780917,0.000005767587,0.00001175162,0.00001699059,0.0001814787],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01674882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9866772,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01301241612391611,"score_gpt":0.2527244340400951,"score_spread":0.239712017916179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}