{"id":"W2036341874","doi":"10.1002/2015wr016945","title":"Debates—Perspectives on socio‐hydrology: Modeling flood risk as a public policy problem","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Resources Research","topic":"Flood Risk Assessment and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":102,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Global Institute for Water Security; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Flood myth; Conceptualization; Damages; Unintended consequences; Floodplain; Public policy; Natural hazard; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Management science; Geography; Environmental science; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Economic growth","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008246644,0.0008819145,0.001082923,0.001939659,0.00247204,0.009161266,0.002341316,0.008521663,0.0081662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02113585,0.000562389,0.001269927,0.001756773,0.01159742,0.01100217,0.004286885,0.005935226,0.0004381149],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007183527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00368906,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00661918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003548838,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995596,0.00337043,0.00009671563,0.0003549439,0.000292469,0.0002894685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9776199,0.01904566,0.001107993,0.0005607135,0.0006672668,0.0009984919],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001491571,0.00005241119,0.0004764261,0.000031916,0.00001858256,0.00007367025,0.0005463156,0.06014038,0.00004314254,0.9356611,0.001251863,0.001689274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001509945,0.00001572396,0.0001253844,0.0000414419,0.000009355188,0.00001338342,0.0005090301,0.06754464,0.00003734381,0.9272712,0.004405375,0.00001200879],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1613222,0.005784496,0.2357592,0.3435392,0.001376695,0.0001443342,0.0004518882,0.000128341,0.2514937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9783663,0.00209481,0.01035812,0.002369905,0.0009357151,0.0001811026,0.00005047516,0.00004334854,0.005600312],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009161266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05212033,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06385560346924375,"score_gpt":0.344933857807896,"score_spread":0.2810782543386523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}