{"id":"W2036401271","doi":"10.1002/j.2158-1592.2009.tb00114.x","title":"AN ANALYSIS OF SUPPLY CHAIN COLLABORATIONS AND THEIR EFFECT ON PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Business Logistics","topic":"Quality and Supply Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":248,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Profitability index; Supply chain; Asset (computer security); Industrial organization; Marketing; Supply chain management; Affect (linguistics); Process (computing); Competitive advantage; Position (finance); Process management; Knowledge management; Finance; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008899916,0.0001631802,0.0005499044,0.0008223707,0.0001151439,0.0001638379,0.0002170221,0.00005069161,0.00003055369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003158004,0.0001101145,0.00009571875,0.001495476,0.000062624,0.0006206695,0.00002846976,0.000109459,0.000002559469],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002250682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002108936,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000335377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004902022,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989252,0.00003045135,0.0005088445,0.0001188518,0.0002694095,0.0001472077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984367,0.0001347025,0.0005769377,0.0002158199,0.0006182817,0.00001758727],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005778818,0.001035496,0.4346571,0.0005073434,0.001037397,0.00003984128,0.0002646669,0.4740754,0.0006623365,0.05066213,0.0008780579,0.03560239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005565031,0.0002491217,0.9146928,0.00005095828,0.0008134269,0.000001263492,0.0002163758,0.08127005,0.00004585868,0.0005601875,0.001396222,0.0001471913],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9713572,0.00004781523,0.02548816,0.0021454,0.00020821,0.0001273677,0.00001332214,0.00001551582,0.0005970201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985091,0.00004975609,0.0001829475,0.0009671669,0.0002344308,9.948487e-7,0.00002349046,0.000007034403,0.00002509094],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4800358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4490338,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02436137131042606,"score_gpt":0.2625095545912962,"score_spread":0.2381481832808701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}