{"id":"W2036401271","doi":"10.1002/j.2158-1592.2009.tb00114.x","title":"AN ANALYSIS OF SUPPLY CHAIN COLLABORATIONS AND THEIR EFFECT ON PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Business Logistics","topic":"Quality and Supply Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":248,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Profitability index; Supply chain; Asset (computer security); Industrial organization; Marketing; Supply chain management; Affect (linguistics); Process (computing); Competitive advantage; Position (finance); Process management; Knowledge management; Finance; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01052656,0.000441065,0.0004648775,0.001808588,0.001199483,0.002147496,0.0005448428,0.0006887573,0.004318434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05518664,0.0001827849,0.000772986,0.002235835,0.001044641,0.001845551,0.003094554,0.001363548,0.0004451323],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009503473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001622253,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007534329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006888955,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9863309,0.008092853,0.0008420718,0.0007242414,0.002697138,0.001312724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8356764,0.0996384,0.04080342,0.004037911,0.01011513,0.00972873],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001467455,0.001694508,0.9465498,0.0001724014,0.0006378303,0.0005251317,0.002682296,0.003456047,0.001804209,0.001175281,0.0002676784,0.03956747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000624548,0.003544067,0.9828015,0.00007765195,0.0002575161,0.000288605,0.004094847,0.004064532,0.002034345,0.001960092,0.0007696031,0.00004472537],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971991,0.00009275133,0.0006688367,0.0001273752,0.0000056033,0.00001980829,0.00006706794,0.00001172772,0.001807733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995995,0.00002371783,0.000189012,0.000006907135,0.000005198517,0.00001712223,0.0000507706,0.000002993639,0.0001047012],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01052656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0556705,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02436137131042606,"score_gpt":0.2625095545912962,"score_spread":0.2381481832808701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}