{"id":"W2036415868","doi":"10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0000679","title":"Method for Analyzing Time-Series GPR Data of Concrete Bridge Decks","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Bridge Engineering","topic":"Geophysical Methods and Applications","field":"Engineering","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Smiths Detection (Canada); Concordia University","funders":"Gran Sasso Science Institute","keywords":"Ground-penetrating radar; Rebar; Bridge (graph theory); Bridge deck; Nondestructive testing; Structural engineering; Deck; Time series; Geotechnical engineering; Geology; Reflection (computer programming); Series (stratigraphy); Radar; Engineering; Computer science; Telecommunications","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008058981,0.000635207,0.0004483639,0.00200588,0.0002472317,0.0005479131,0.0006871141,0.0005905213,0.00188448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001838648,0.000249594,0.0005486981,0.001433023,0.0002318977,0.000496942,0.0005550843,0.0006066472,0.001340407],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001697715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006236932,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009274512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001327451,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993865,0.0001061188,0.0000537253,0.0001700197,0.0002470209,0.0000366095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993122,0.0002233603,0.00009773273,0.00008391641,0.0002583139,0.00002463339],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000248267,0.0001707711,0.005078084,0.0003731108,0.0001175531,0.0003189613,0.0002335576,0.01635104,0.1688443,0.00337775,0.001803989,0.8030826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001019851,0.0003950676,0.02118681,0.00005424701,0.000142674,0.002067645,0.000311365,0.8599057,0.09791564,0.003291641,0.01449019,0.0001370685],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.009364167,0.00006577703,0.9892665,0.00002271876,0.0000227885,0.0001036454,0.0001624034,0.0006380976,0.0003538908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07955968,0.0001769984,0.9181979,0.00002677618,0.00002389904,0.0003670917,0.0004345245,0.0000750617,0.001138109],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00200588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006304264,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02831185524289401,"score_gpt":0.2986671980140144,"score_spread":0.2703553427711204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}