{"id":"W2036418579","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2009.07.002","title":"Beyond the double-jeopardy hypothesis: Assessing emotion on the faces of multiply-categorizable targets of prejudice","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":168,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Hostility; Anger; Happiness; Perception; Prejudice (legal term); Social psychology; Categorization; Social perception; Face perception; Emotion perception; Facial expression; Developmental psychology; Communication","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001347565,0.0001545869,0.0004223709,0.00009450573,0.0006189502,0.00004066372,0.0006658669,0.0002276676,0.0003022889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001275391,0.00009785992,0.0003050624,0.0003195595,0.0008980136,0.0002619155,0.0000249122,0.0003591911,0.000008146419],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000963918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008472347,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001734121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001644521,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975783,0.0007243775,0.0006952962,0.0001737664,0.0005042027,0.0003240303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981215,0.0003290305,0.001135821,0.0001479291,0.0002034348,0.00006229047],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001903792,0.003112401,0.00163321,0.000005830241,0.0003941464,0.00001068104,0.1247514,0.00001053624,0.7265634,0.0969436,0.03136687,0.01330418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01016382,0.007346921,0.2817607,0.0001720507,0.0002757114,0.00005957453,0.3538611,0.00001151523,0.1855779,0.1367319,0.02315152,0.0008872717],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8995734,0.0009370127,0.00007099842,0.01556503,0.001823954,0.0002607239,0.000002760307,0.00001100635,0.08175512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967691,0.00008871363,0.0001300769,0.001932725,0.000941381,0.000005455362,6.161875e-7,0.00001085011,0.0001211324],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5409854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4760527,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0847735874539589,"score_gpt":0.4131521703356524,"score_spread":0.3283785828816935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}