{"id":"W2036490200","doi":"10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.02.015","title":"The accuracy of predicting carcass composition of three different pig genetic lines by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Meat Science","topic":"Meat and Animal Product Quality","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada","funders":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada","keywords":"Loin; Dual energy; Carcass weight; Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; Lean tissue; Mathematics; Bone mineral content; Composition (language); Lean meat; Statistics; Animal science; Bone mineral; Body weight; Medicine; Biology; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003135687,0.0006769065,0.0004100597,0.0007204844,0.0002229948,0.0009077931,0.0004050348,0.0007454633,0.0005238052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004551231,0.000240538,0.0004224223,0.0001968047,0.0005776866,0.0003708544,0.0002761395,0.0004585937,0.0003273835],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002207513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001400893,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002658358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002185589,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992263,0.0003530881,0.00006209225,0.0001983463,0.0001074966,0.0000527491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995301,0.003485749,0.0003409926,0.0002882911,0.000408654,0.000175349],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00287162,0.0001314273,0.8831679,0.00002957626,0.0005206669,0.0001796371,0.0002255577,0.003055826,0.08922384,0.00006328303,0.00009179254,0.02043893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007302671,0.0006938155,0.9555221,0.00001567989,0.0003702322,0.0005648119,0.0001756874,0.02555302,0.01668011,0.0001321783,0.0001954501,0.00002398582],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982886,0.00006177305,0.001397481,0.00001338984,0.000003808855,0.000002135669,0.00004543236,0.00002301138,0.0001643321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983979,0.00003653211,0.001289193,0.00001911288,0.000002116494,0.000002641108,0.0001100801,0.00001077908,0.0001315931],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003135687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01658326,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03161825851880201,"score_gpt":0.2545038772021596,"score_spread":0.2228856186833576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}