{"id":"W2036698779","doi":"10.1016/j.renene.2004.10.003","title":"MEP-type distribution function: a better alternative to Weibull function for wind speed distributions","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Renewable Energy","topic":"Wind Energy Research and Development","field":"Engineering","cited_by":119,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Weibull distribution; Wind speed; Wind power; Probability density function; Wind profile power law; Exponential function; Probabilistic logic; Log wind profile; Probability distribution; Environmental science; Exponential distribution; Meteorology; Mathematics; Statistics; Engineering; Wind gradient; Physics; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001097729,0.0002136425,0.000184162,0.0001005381,0.000201123,0.00007137831,0.0001289909,0.00010814,0.0001152752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004593073,0.0002129146,0.00008137484,0.0005044683,0.00002276671,0.0001779218,0.00004344501,0.00008310586,0.00006349279],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005515139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009568643,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001331192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004287814,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986562,0.00001564158,0.0002344693,0.0002931463,0.0002631283,0.0005374755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992668,0.00003321585,0.00002493317,0.0002262738,0.0001792419,0.000269545],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001489321,0.00003920286,0.00003500726,0.0000154847,0.0001254287,0.000003610724,0.00002190987,0.9583659,0.007793564,0.002362188,0.02935573,0.001733026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001558778,0.0005486196,0.001283499,0.00006287038,0.00004903993,0.000009293125,0.0000454533,0.009149958,0.09044543,0.01352438,0.8827916,0.0005310779],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05701783,0.0001815454,0.9376538,0.0004690799,0.001788382,0.000176021,0.000173865,0.000295562,0.002243871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923377,0.00007421415,0.001318975,0.0002314915,0.0009331703,0.00005886239,0.002296608,0.00004778377,0.002701214],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9492159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8682405,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0126511926450069,"score_gpt":0.220686712554134,"score_spread":0.2080355199091271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}