{"id":"W2036698779","doi":"10.1016/j.renene.2004.10.003","title":"MEP-type distribution function: a better alternative to Weibull function for wind speed distributions","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Renewable Energy","topic":"Wind Energy Research and Development","field":"Engineering","cited_by":119,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Weibull distribution; Wind speed; Wind power; Probability density function; Wind profile power law; Exponential function; Probabilistic logic; Log wind profile; Probability distribution; Environmental science; Exponential distribution; Meteorology; Mathematics; Statistics; Engineering; Wind gradient; Physics; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003492127,0.001192778,0.001309353,0.001575118,0.0004158405,0.001718049,0.001666934,0.001751309,0.004853754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01221096,0.0003171225,0.001464724,0.002214352,0.0005967672,0.003658179,0.001018195,0.002306547,0.002404446],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006132498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004896662,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007997451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004786197,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987506,0.0005288082,0.00008821055,0.0001901044,0.0003649641,0.00007738056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952387,0.00249934,0.0003405353,0.00078066,0.001031531,0.0001092664],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004379333,0.0001410393,0.004849489,0.0004547513,0.000214779,0.0006269191,0.000205618,0.2856498,0.014086,0.3936759,0.01288854,0.2867691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001594328,0.00007381215,0.001445112,0.00004023348,0.00003719317,0.0005644982,0.00002708171,0.9301608,0.002508319,0.054269,0.01080919,0.00004876676],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002993579,0.0002252624,0.9945147,0.0001522589,0.0000798772,0.00001318115,0.000116438,0.0003804957,0.001524293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4716073,0.002131027,0.4987157,0.0007494856,0.001049692,0.0003910016,0.00145822,0.001903534,0.02199404],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004853754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01846838,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0126511926450069,"score_gpt":0.220686712554134,"score_spread":0.2080355199091271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}