{"id":"W2036701577","doi":"10.1348/000711009x475853","title":"Detecting a lack of association: An equivalence testing approach","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology","topic":"Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Type I and type II errors; Equivalence (formal languages); Sample size determination; Test (biology); Association test; Statistics; Statistical hypothesis testing; Econometrics; Independence (probability theory); Statistical power; Sample (material); Psychology; Computer science; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2865615,0.001794964,0.004775877,0.008750044,0.001922722,0.005089742,0.006749189,0.004569479,0.007042953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6846911,0.001084338,0.004986869,0.006152449,0.01329894,0.01129709,0.008941964,0.007414558,0.0006847212],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002121706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004477589,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007561881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000377389,"domain_scores_codex":[0.6106133,0.2943346,0.0191898,0.02257688,0.05115062,0.002134758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2145181,0.7191576,0.02196751,0.0289459,0.01358789,0.001822972],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004078578,0.001405854,0.0695333,0.003503613,0.006861946,0.00132549,0.006751082,0.01231737,0.002886514,0.3507679,0.006439701,0.5341287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001041159,0.005981304,0.02478566,0.0009631812,0.001688215,0.001953684,0.00178423,0.08333107,0.002797496,0.8645161,0.01088298,0.0002749012],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.04363108,0.001382154,0.9422256,0.002997042,0.0005866599,0.001560811,0.0003260555,0.0002683285,0.007022237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.570909,0.0007154406,0.4209202,0.00156379,0.0006784122,0.004160854,0.0003073624,0.0001490074,0.0005959603],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7134385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8797967,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6273935671893198,"score_gpt":0.5794021805264894,"score_spread":0.04799138666283043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}