{"id":"W2036737516","doi":"10.1558/cam.v11i1.20265","title":"Back to the future: Can conversation analysis be used to judge physicians’ malpractice history?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communication & Medicine","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Malpractice; Conversation; Harm; Medicine; Conversation analysis; Medical malpractice; Family medicine; Face (sociological concept); Psychology; Medical emergency; Law; Social psychology; Political science; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03025581,0.000645652,0.0007251395,0.008279539,0.003781581,0.007942243,0.00127548,0.001938385,0.002407135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1312777,0.0003649902,0.0004501401,0.002833999,0.007102172,0.01261149,0.003828264,0.00235717,0.0009266762],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002962357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002295101,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008971834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008497074,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9791591,0.0163526,0.001005645,0.0007778741,0.002088587,0.0006161685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.886404,0.08861091,0.008235713,0.002814329,0.01197395,0.001961142],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000315495,0.00007794375,0.05153466,0.001303826,0.000116826,0.0007942866,0.7572343,0.0003308109,0.002957058,0.01846306,0.004985975,0.1618858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002573232,0.0002221166,0.0580265,0.002940714,0.0001054426,0.00117941,0.838838,0.006273837,0.003069229,0.05329667,0.03576502,0.000257297],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7842631,0.01229125,0.08446617,0.05216821,0.001109436,0.0005798455,0.001073258,0.0003529841,0.06369559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9804411,0.001562021,0.01464955,0.001697376,0.0001879839,0.0002622515,0.0002009207,0.0000443528,0.0009543851],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03025581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1600099,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1463761284703756,"score_gpt":0.3313116255590074,"score_spread":0.1849354970886318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}