{"id":"W2036883412","doi":"10.1002/rcm.2626","title":"Stable‐hydrogen isotope heterogeneity in keratinous materials: mass spectrometry and migratory wildlife tissue subsampling strategies","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry","topic":"Isotope Analysis in Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":120,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Feather; Isotope analysis; Isotope; Wildlife; Hydrogen isotope; Stable isotope ratio; Chemistry; Range (aeronautics); Isotope-ratio mass spectrometry; Ecology; Zoology; Mass spectrometry; Biology; Hydrogen; Chromatography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001307513,0.0003696114,0.0006140182,0.000693033,0.00030107,0.0002063734,0.001459263,0.0002295596,0.001539547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007085338,0.0004147089,0.00006762565,0.001991811,0.0005680549,0.0005626169,0.0006886687,0.0005495391,0.0001470271],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008336001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005184366,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002780444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01200844,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966655,0.0006157227,0.0009342885,0.0006783836,0.0003478373,0.0007582806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972687,0.0003025345,0.0002742049,0.002048319,0.00001771868,0.00008847923],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001688182,0.0003448958,0.5428673,0.00001887365,0.00003649942,0.00002041727,0.0001443309,0.001937483,0.4517055,0.00257942,0.0001301062,0.0001983294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00132434,0.0002588585,0.8372084,0.00005050157,0.00007315815,0.00005805637,0.001435906,0.002668662,0.1330346,0.01961829,0.003102726,0.001166511],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9868371,0.002009629,0.00147797,0.0005728098,0.00006700213,0.0004834052,0.00002502008,0.00008238009,0.008444655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9329733,0.001363064,0.065131,0.000150725,0.00005147021,0.0001253719,0.00007081431,0.0000436997,0.00009050884],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3186709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998305,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01555333570097628,"score_gpt":0.266806347216384,"score_spread":0.2512530115154077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}