{"id":"W2036930917","doi":"10.1016/j.compgeo.2011.06.001","title":"On the efficiency and predictability of strain energy for the evaluation of liquefaction potential: A numerical study","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers and Geotechnics","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Predictability; Liquefaction; Pore water pressure; Strain energy density function; Geotechnical engineering; Overburden; Effective stress; Strain energy; Environmental science; Structural engineering; Geology; Engineering; Mathematics; Finite element method; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001986939,0.0006415818,0.0007501006,0.001277129,0.0005747106,0.001289828,0.0006417065,0.001249151,0.0007069074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01227449,0.0004332737,0.0007413201,0.0009217879,0.001116286,0.001607012,0.0006877604,0.0007970174,0.0001049235],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000475563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005893127,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005410527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00281322,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995095,0.0002546909,0.00003447317,0.00004983029,0.0001114962,0.00004003995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898897,0.008803404,0.0005100855,0.00034395,0.0003640348,0.0000886542],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001067164,0.00007263799,0.005870361,0.0000551032,0.00002902976,0.00009344648,0.00004893675,0.9749943,0.003092682,0.004773546,0.0001155713,0.01074771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002601613,0.00001783325,0.0006469805,0.000002801192,0.000003672138,0.000009071475,0.000005061107,0.9985398,0.0004455801,0.0003037648,0.00001898842,0.000003878447],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8525552,0.001255145,0.1405773,0.0004902869,0.00003926185,0.00005759276,0.0001260599,0.0001408243,0.004758584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908692,0.0002839368,0.008288315,0.00001680276,0.00002340574,0.0000197333,0.00004847723,0.0000652057,0.0003849195],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005410527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01075804,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02721421453138521,"score_gpt":0.2253867996188577,"score_spread":0.1981725850874725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}