{"id":"W2036930917","doi":"10.1016/j.compgeo.2011.06.001","title":"On the efficiency and predictability of strain energy for the evaluation of liquefaction potential: A numerical study","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers and Geotechnics","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Predictability; Liquefaction; Pore water pressure; Strain energy density function; Geotechnical engineering; Overburden; Effective stress; Strain energy; Environmental science; Structural engineering; Geology; Engineering; Mathematics; Finite element method; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007729937,0.00008310808,0.0001184786,0.00002960837,0.00004423357,0.000005658582,0.0001033906,0.00005985135,0.000001877599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006776366,0.00005215193,0.000035559,0.00008988863,0.00003712801,0.00001738465,0.00003293997,0.00009504006,3.048834e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001108971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008246744,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000272274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001466567,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994349,0.00003392886,0.0001735575,0.000107095,0.0001635521,0.00008689852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994881,0.0001771116,0.00003587712,0.0002100653,0.00006723461,0.00002163653],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003031377,0.000196862,0.000005336099,0.00006980309,0.00006460949,1.946232e-7,0.0006553735,0.8719789,0.0003990744,0.009015613,0.00004684173,0.1175371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002101647,0.0004190606,0.00158984,0.00001498263,0.00005728168,0.000001479997,0.00009636713,0.9941331,0.000452137,0.002950477,0.00002317852,0.00005190044],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3667463,0.0001584997,0.6325573,0.00002455,0.0001161824,0.0003259178,0.000006609969,0.00005390059,0.00001080249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996807,0.00003364408,0.0002205844,0.000007252388,0.000009606129,0.00003842952,8.578008e-7,0.000008244833,6.551988e-7],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6329345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2126694,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02721421453138521,"score_gpt":0.2253867996188577,"score_spread":0.1981725850874725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}