{"id":"W2037094271","doi":"10.5558/tfc78146-1","title":"Assessment of relative environmental risk from logyard run-off in British Columbia","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Forest Biomass Utilization and Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"BC Hydro","keywords":"Environmental science; Risk assessment; Relative risk; Risk management; Risk analysis (engineering); Geography; Statistics; Business; Mathematics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007019897,0.0003047597,0.0002088813,0.001976816,0.001647862,0.001509948,0.0007751224,0.0002974118,0.001611809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003461377,0.0002203843,0.0001771817,0.002581681,0.0009091854,0.0002856614,0.001144616,0.0004908134,0.0001182251],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00843762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005997415,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.852009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9480433,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985148,0.0002161447,0.00008340229,0.00009948228,0.0008372237,0.0002488444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997108,0.0005530994,0.0006463234,0.00007320868,0.001150116,0.0004693159],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001149222,0.00008543085,0.967765,0.00007781446,0.00003301559,0.0004494299,0.003227549,0.001018455,0.001491646,0.0001075307,0.0004985785,0.02513065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002060306,0.00008434895,0.9890666,0.00003374754,0.00001047124,0.00008754607,0.008783656,0.0009357624,0.000243537,0.00004557563,0.0006941148,0.0000125651],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978842,0.00006750482,0.0001475953,0.00004272973,0.000001184053,0.00002872541,0.0001548783,0.000004503109,0.001668651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986167,0.0001181675,0.000288854,0.00001430884,7.691582e-7,0.00001437321,0.0001826349,0.000001752427,0.000762535],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.147991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2977251,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007028398652597659,"score_gpt":0.1946300590702911,"score_spread":0.1876016604176935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}