{"id":"W2037098141","doi":"10.2752/146069203789355462","title":"The ‘Interanimation’ of Worlds: Creative Metaphors in Art and Design","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Design Journal","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Salient; Context (archaeology); Argument (complex analysis); Aesthetics; Similarity (geometry); Style (visual arts); Function (biology); Perception; Linguistics; Psychology; Cognitive science; Sociology; Communication; Epistemology; Computer science; Visual arts; Art; Artificial intelligence; History; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003297475,0.000102079,0.0001560825,0.00009536809,0.0001936053,0.00006037437,0.0001562698,0.00003924421,0.0006809246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002378034,0.00005182328,0.00005772951,0.0002007724,0.0001237791,0.00008436648,0.00000695809,0.0002751411,0.00005083929],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001981389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003603494,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001018109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008950699,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969251,0.002317901,0.0003142018,0.00009945945,0.0001499869,0.0001934233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986414,0.0008891762,0.0001932684,0.000151275,0.00008141602,0.00004346145],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.009505466,0.001459821,0.003267326,0.00004378634,0.003601119,0.0005616425,0.3423323,0.0009601632,0.02803682,0.2392021,0.1190403,0.2519892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01258712,0.002962895,0.05063372,0.0005215669,0.001257516,0.006154027,0.1528316,0.00124065,0.056504,0.6960194,0.01802048,0.001267033],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1516272,0.01042058,0.7654775,0.0008982663,0.0009247582,0.001052962,0.000004582991,0.0000250758,0.06956906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933205,0.0002507382,0.002685309,0.0001790603,0.00005670529,0.00002881247,4.485934e-7,0.00001408092,0.003464388],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8416932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7455647,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04345578647233734,"score_gpt":0.3017213242820251,"score_spread":0.2582655378096878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}