{"id":"W2037119328","doi":"10.1016/j.ijindorg.2005.04.005","title":"Rivalry between strategic alliances","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Industrial Organization","topic":"Merger and Competition Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of British Columbia; University of Calgary","keywords":"Rivalry; Alliance; Commit; Profit (economics); Strategic alliance; Business; Welfare; Dilemma; Prisoner's dilemma; Industrial organization; Economics; Microeconomics; International trade; Market economy; Game theory; Political science; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002897862,0.0002183624,0.0007633435,0.001544093,0.001320355,0.005078259,0.0009208868,0.001771379,0.01280835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02335336,0.0004418778,0.0004880057,0.001813824,0.001934851,0.005376774,0.001827401,0.001212467,0.0008836847],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009744262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009060497,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001113229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001638738,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974313,0.001388444,0.00009046221,0.0002514822,0.0004278701,0.0004104588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852367,0.009978651,0.001636364,0.00095214,0.001180361,0.00101574],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002973503,0.0001259734,0.008813201,0.0001008607,0.00007767141,0.0005525379,0.001684144,0.009358996,0.00142096,0.9535289,0.002568135,0.02147123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001531673,0.0003583074,0.009534615,0.00008429275,0.0001359069,0.0007587216,0.005361848,0.07683899,0.0007705698,0.895852,0.01011556,0.00003598656],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8677477,0.0009974372,0.02550419,0.001764349,0.00005675419,0.00008417382,0.0000887472,0.00004205086,0.1037145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995695,0.0001223747,0.001101113,0.0000334912,0.00001360226,0.00001103549,0.0000281936,0.000002763989,0.00299247],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01280835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04284823,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08594416093270102,"score_gpt":0.2584777272829779,"score_spread":0.1725335663502769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}