{"id":"W2037119328","doi":"10.1016/j.ijindorg.2005.04.005","title":"Rivalry between strategic alliances","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Industrial Organization","topic":"Merger and Competition Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of British Columbia; University of Calgary","keywords":"Rivalry; Alliance; Commit; Profit (economics); Strategic alliance; Business; Welfare; Dilemma; Prisoner's dilemma; Industrial organization; Economics; Microeconomics; International trade; Market economy; Game theory; Political science; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000360308,0.00007533743,0.0002149109,0.0003083224,0.00003568075,0.0001111194,0.0003536829,0.00008526003,0.004004622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002144315,0.00007988789,0.00008661661,0.0003290586,0.00001793829,0.0003908649,0.00002240771,0.0001612111,0.0003712178],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001329548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005090426,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001591179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002325593,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988618,0.00001831606,0.0008104963,0.0001039005,0.0001238179,0.00008163449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986631,0.00002983452,0.0007877746,0.00006943585,0.0003861712,0.0000637024],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003293974,0.0001895002,0.7831249,0.000002106733,0.0007957161,0.00001353946,0.0002870642,0.002278432,0.0001683361,0.1937592,0.006562831,0.01278539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01554087,0.0007097164,0.113719,0.0003606052,0.0003272613,0.000254926,0.001259998,0.002943226,0.01999516,0.1367963,0.7060544,0.002038399],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9427631,0.0004760521,0.02502571,0.01356276,0.003017986,0.00007939515,0.00006923022,0.00003088426,0.01497487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952018,0.0001371241,0.0006065967,0.0001969459,0.003525345,2.664466e-7,0.00003305524,0.0000112244,0.0002876268],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6994916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969059,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08594416093270102,"score_gpt":0.2584777272829779,"score_spread":0.1725335663502769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}