{"id":"W2037221430","doi":"10.2749/101686600780481446","title":"Two Structural Composite Lumber Bridges in Northwestern Ontario, Canada","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Structural Engineering International","topic":"Wood Treatment and Properties","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Transportation of Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Bridge (graph theory); Composite number; Engineered wood; Engineering; Structural type; Civil engineering; Forensic engineering; Structural engineering; Materials science; Composite material","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001766894,0.0002313227,0.0001913052,0.0005242077,0.004576809,0.000658916,0.0005514985,0.0004763665,0.005791701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002953077,0.0001610845,0.0001301833,0.0006707957,0.000519125,0.0001661118,0.0004831934,0.0003247927,0.000445797],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01930303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01840723,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9710633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965518,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997459,0.00001132109,0.000003231549,0.00003453292,0.00009373005,0.0001113506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997268,0.00001065131,0.00001573843,0.000008831475,0.0001555498,0.00008241671],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002763296,0.001675595,0.5217426,0.0006152442,0.0001218391,0.01693316,0.04074335,0.007177067,0.1206759,0.012954,0.0352857,0.2393123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008892985,0.0004427227,0.8729826,0.00008463188,0.00003608413,0.0007694677,0.02101792,0.002868174,0.00560904,0.0003756766,0.09568051,0.00004436883],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9744242,0.0001662368,0.0004009234,0.0002164569,0.00001823427,0.0001132213,0.000390968,0.00002313626,0.02424658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.960108,0.0001373385,0.0009855367,0.000094844,0.000004254847,0.00005177951,0.0004419344,0.00001004389,0.03816628],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02893668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1400539,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004063112070353361,"score_gpt":0.1792245172226047,"score_spread":0.1751614051522514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}