{"id":"W2037313304","doi":"10.1109/tdc.2006.1668545","title":"Computer Studies of Dynamic Shunt Compensation Performance","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Power System Optimization and Stability","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Shunt (medical); Compensation (psychology); Computer science; Transient (computer programming); Control theory (sociology); Power electronics; Electric power system; Harmonic analysis; Electronic engineering; Operating point; Transient response; Control engineering; Voltage; Engineering; Power (physics); Electrical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003050373,0.000304359,0.0003312098,0.0005821865,0.000156219,0.0003277246,0.0002738953,0.0003156355,0.003759292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003159055,0.0001146524,0.0001600772,0.000954684,0.0002073775,0.0004646674,0.0001342847,0.0003219558,0.0002852915],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002820577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001832939,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002833729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001657005,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998575,0.00002922354,0.000008796399,0.00002464415,0.00005929486,0.00002056297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975871,0.001757922,0.00009732444,0.0001360132,0.0003944088,0.00002721945],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004302461,0.0001140259,0.002894718,0.0001807632,0.00004250975,0.0001199067,0.0001663673,0.9162576,0.01731212,0.006963051,0.002182292,0.05333648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001455857,0.0000924171,0.002213691,0.000006957541,0.00001041775,0.00005195894,0.0000233649,0.9898272,0.005627711,0.0009589507,0.001162351,0.00001044833],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8742074,0.0009697702,0.0861409,0.0003238578,0.00005578665,0.000047455,0.0006603701,0.001461404,0.03613303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919665,0.0001828461,0.005612903,0.00001279403,0.000009378049,0.00002133334,0.0002249734,0.00006692433,0.001902391],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003759292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0125761,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01085626585721388,"score_gpt":0.2221700581499397,"score_spread":0.2113137922927258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}