{"id":"W2037359044","doi":"10.1177/1065912909352775","title":"Judicial Politicization, Ideology, and Activism at the High Courts of the United States, Canada, and Australia","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Judicial activism; Political science; Law; Voting; Judicial opinion; Judicial independence; Judicial review; Case selection; Supreme court; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001554308,0.00008164481,0.0003274675,0.002673531,0.005034926,0.002391339,0.0003955635,0.0004829224,0.002627386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006983314,0.0001971245,0.000184759,0.002350757,0.003375953,0.0005156324,0.001501089,0.001646524,0.0001916749],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01123608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01118369,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7449914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9225341,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979321,0.0002886854,0.0000513091,0.0001500153,0.0007474275,0.0008305396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912537,0.001509235,0.002379057,0.0001306713,0.001953275,0.002774089],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006536933,0.0001238533,0.9645479,0.00001827919,0.00005836641,0.0001825289,0.01567169,0.0002872901,0.0003819512,0.007262366,0.001572867,0.009827453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004494628,0.00001177282,0.9925967,0.00001338325,0.000007537429,0.00002381391,0.005568297,0.0001857533,0.0000555322,0.0003403779,0.001185633,0.000006566988],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916788,0.0001445222,0.00004732029,0.00067117,0.000005970847,0.000007214481,0.00003848235,0.000001333105,0.007405118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988644,0.00008005688,0.00002406473,0.00006934044,0.000007456214,0.000002841608,0.00003296466,0.000001380516,0.0009174441],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2550086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5130208,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05646041653789657,"score_gpt":0.3829438105350005,"score_spread":0.3264833939971039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}