{"id":"W2037429554","doi":"10.1002/ieam.183","title":"Variation in the level of protection afforded to birds and crustaceans exposed to different pesticides under standard risk assessment procedures","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","topic":"Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Pesticide; Risk assessment; Crustacean; Toxicology; Environmental science; Environmental health; Risk analysis (engineering); Biology; Fishery; Ecology; Business; Medicine; Computer science; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003941804,0.0001886109,0.0002109969,0.00005875604,0.0001413765,0.00005794486,0.0001399359,0.000045577,0.0001282068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007991402,0.00007300553,0.00004145456,0.0002190155,0.00004104065,0.00008967397,0.000119764,0.0001125666,0.000001410115],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001328168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005686617,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007883069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002704267,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986946,0.0001462682,0.0003022143,0.0003301912,0.0003272244,0.000199505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996758,0.00004746933,0.000109115,0.00007786092,0.00001209776,0.0000776816],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008014149,0.002582369,0.394458,0.0001580397,0.0006122543,0.00002732494,0.004561246,0.001495313,0.2716573,0.009389218,0.0002396764,0.3140178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002438325,0.0007866311,0.9912245,0.00004834449,0.00008991145,0.000001062522,0.004894057,0.00047232,0.0008474199,0.001071846,0.0001692732,0.0001507972],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9900138,0.00001954313,0.007643878,0.0007220992,0.00002158244,0.001073453,0.00007196963,0.00001308529,0.0004206009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972043,0.0003927637,0.001945993,0.0001755404,0.00001207378,0.0001902287,0.00002188936,0.00000205837,0.00005512863],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5967665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2977079,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04717146580773572,"score_gpt":0.2559612741843121,"score_spread":0.2087898083765764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}