{"id":"W2037445916","doi":"10.4296/cwrj3004331","title":"Camp Creek Revisited: Streamflow Changes Following Salvage Harvesting in a Medium-Sized, Snowmelt-Dominated Catchment","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques","topic":"Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Snowmelt; Drainage basin; Streamflow; Hydrology (agriculture); Environmental science; STREAMS; Water year; Drainage; Snow; Elevation (ballistics); Geology; Geography; Ecology; Geomorphology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006908136,0.0001884207,0.0005865741,0.0007351551,0.0009622052,0.001041944,0.0005979922,0.000368565,0.001311038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001451494,0.0001309921,0.0002659971,0.001517964,0.0008385265,0.0003683674,0.0007873898,0.0004068523,0.0001104817],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002757641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001914792,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1840184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4026015,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992835,0.0001844144,0.0000284856,0.0001655901,0.0002054961,0.0001326041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991202,0.000188921,0.0001343473,0.00006479301,0.0002283341,0.0002634601],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00106411,0.0009221242,0.9755778,0.00004559603,0.0001369882,0.0007682372,0.001114086,0.001224435,0.007620476,0.00008595134,0.0003205309,0.01111965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001682333,0.0002417464,0.9972699,0.000003060208,0.00001902422,0.00005704794,0.0008564405,0.0009412767,0.0003750346,0.00002950084,0.0001844434,0.000005674287],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994361,0.00001289757,0.0001100638,0.00000521408,0.000001511278,0.00002462554,0.0001010677,0.000005004762,0.0003035027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994557,0.00000750707,0.0001771392,0.000008641829,0.000001487776,0.00001894638,0.0001663106,0.000001900207,0.0001622297],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8159816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3658946,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01051458755612605,"score_gpt":0.2061384837983987,"score_spread":0.1956238962422726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}