{"id":"W2037457234","doi":"10.1103/physreva.67.013406","title":"Strong-field molecular alignment for quantum logic and quantum control","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physical Review A","topic":"Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Steacie Institute for Molecular Sciences","funders":"","keywords":"Physics; Hamiltonian (control theory); Quantum control; Diatomic molecule; Qubit; Adiabatic process; Quantum gate; Quantum mechanics; Controlled NOT gate; Adiabatic quantum computation; Stimulated Raman adiabatic passage; Quantum; Laser; Field (mathematics); Coherent control; Quantum computer; Molecule","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006133816,0.0006184684,0.0004498224,0.0003570358,0.000816367,0.001077229,0.0007550782,0.0009849741,0.004373024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005689044,0.0002679353,0.0003002978,0.0004646462,0.001877858,0.002293454,0.0007085436,0.001592977,0.000691219],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001011853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004774377,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003061558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005775547,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997461,0.00008993256,0.000009857281,0.00003396297,0.00009405763,0.00002606501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998183,0.0001009605,0.00001837644,0.00003379241,0.00001837843,0.00001025646],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001493859,0.00001443885,0.00002967659,0.00009908457,0.00000511042,0.00004042835,0.0000317127,0.003611505,0.0100187,0.9667868,0.001141168,0.01820653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002635093,0.0001214956,0.0001015393,0.00006806901,0.0000150459,0.0001424398,0.00003975322,0.05438238,0.01981208,0.8507192,0.07453379,0.00003782441],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02497573,0.02921819,0.8553013,0.006191396,0.001032116,0.0001307978,0.00008332767,0.0006197401,0.0824474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6470714,0.02013733,0.3067563,0.001684451,0.001338331,0.0003848803,0.00007484307,0.000153464,0.02239892],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004373024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01462919,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01710241527485171,"score_gpt":0.3298161286255104,"score_spread":0.3127137133506586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}