{"id":"W2037472990","doi":"10.1080/13561820701605474","title":"Acknowledging complexity: Critically analyzing context to understand interdisciplinary research","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Interprofessional Care","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Health Services; University of Alberta; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Multidisciplinary approach; Engineering ethics; Context (archaeology); General partnership; Discipline; Sociology; Health care; Management science; Cross disciplinary; Epistemology; Data science; Social science; Computer science; Political science; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1047827,0.002073957,0.004212559,0.01230458,0.01559656,0.03151616,0.006732855,0.00928904,0.001842099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1496146,0.001710868,0.001592167,0.006869534,0.09589734,0.04437996,0.03023875,0.01724743,0.0002914117],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01407238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02762282,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004619972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008447069,"domain_scores_codex":[0.86787,0.1121739,0.005060236,0.00458632,0.007398954,0.002910667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7328191,0.2254094,0.01394884,0.01257021,0.01063701,0.004615552],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009804562,0.00005385559,0.003834375,0.003150399,0.0002025273,0.002482201,0.2668255,0.002068782,0.001034392,0.6732791,0.004260807,0.04271003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002818568,0.00005136751,0.001167023,0.003728903,0.0001133885,0.000617552,0.1436161,0.001340615,0.0003979389,0.78297,0.065883,0.00008603982],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09956616,0.1157573,0.4289489,0.2708184,0.008107485,0.00153554,0.0001777709,0.000273947,0.07481438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7946017,0.025994,0.1610265,0.01240147,0.002104525,0.001917772,0.0001032072,0.0001805882,0.001670233],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8952173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5541507,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2787563295905047,"score_gpt":0.5766537275343682,"score_spread":0.2978973979438635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}