{"id":"W2037535649","doi":"10.1016/j.spl.2009.04.011","title":"Modelling heavy-tailed count data using a generalised Poisson-inverse Gaussian family","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistics & Probability Letters","topic":"Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Poisson distribution; Inverse Gaussian distribution; Count data; Statistics; Gaussian; Exponential family; Inverse; Applied mathematics; Probability density function; Statistical physics; Distribution (mathematics); Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001383267,0.0003746007,0.0004450539,0.0001101998,0.0002816224,0.0003739606,0.001828205,0.0001095232,0.000008187327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009459725,0.0003621189,0.00007256946,0.0003821684,0.0001444259,0.0007637285,0.0003394108,0.0003564251,0.00001098618],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002342603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002478118,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003328659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002772718,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964078,0.0004103125,0.000615628,0.001263308,0.0005733988,0.0007295684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996644,0.0001434282,0.0002063962,0.002591145,0.0001400235,0.0002750237],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001031426,0.0003793771,0.0001518984,0.0001510263,0.00008484998,0.0002189822,0.001838392,0.02467168,0.02365661,0.8946687,0.01836893,0.03570642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003021777,0.00003770655,0.00006271369,0.00002400338,0.00002709651,0.000008796767,0.000001040891,0.6680321,0.00008126479,0.3306699,0.0004437298,0.000309515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01382864,0.00005967856,0.9806839,0.003912204,0.0003734212,0.0005465857,0.0003217522,0.0001779296,0.00009585921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0144813,0.0000135058,0.976779,0.008443088,0.0001435859,0.000006325368,0.0000984986,0.00002131205,0.00001341647],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6433604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998831,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0909370416795725,"score_gpt":0.3058885405100507,"score_spread":0.2149514988304781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}